See assessment quality across your study.
Train raters with AI patients, record study assessments in Coagen, and review every one for administration and scoring. Your study's rules keep raters qualified automatically.
| Site and rater | Reviewed | Within one point | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Site 01 | 40 of 42 | 95% | |
| Rater 03 | 17 of 18 | 94% | Qualified |
| Rater 07 | 23 of 24 | 96% | Qualified |
| Site 02 | 31 of 31 | 86% | |
| Rater 04 | 16 of 16 | 97% | Qualified |
| Rater 05 | 15 of 15 | 74% | Paused |
| Site 03 | 6 of 9 | 92% | |
| Rater 06 | 6 of 9 | 92% | Qualified |
Quality measures only. No clinical scores or participant identifiers.
Every assessment reviewed.
Raters and site teams see each finding with the evidence behind it, and a better question to ask next time. You see how it adds up across the study.
The rater's view
WorksheetReview 1
Within 1 point 17 of 17Exact 15 of 17Administration 1 item to look at
Adherence · Fair
1 · Depressed mood: past week not set
Mood was asked about "lately", so the rating's timeframe wasn't established.
Interview 07:58Interviewer07:58
How has your mood been lately?
Participant08:03
Up and down. Worse since the start of the month.
Try asking
"Over the past week, how has your mood been?"
Quality that maintains itself.
Set the standard once, for every site. When a rater's quality slips, Coagen pauses their new assessments, assigns fresh practice and reinstates them when they requalify. Every step is logged.
HAM-D-17
- Paused
Adherence below Fair across the last 5 assessments. New HAM-D-17 assessments paused.Mon 09:12 - Fresh practice assigned
2 AI-patient casesMon 09:12 - Practice reviewed
2 of 2 casesWed 10:48 - Qualified
The study's Qualify rules are metWed 10:49 - Next assessment
P-1052 · Baseline · Thu 09:30